Home / PDPA / Enforcement history

PDPC enforcement history — selected PDPA fines

Last reviewed: June 2026. Source: PDPC commission's decisions register.

This page summarises selected PDPC enforcement actions to give Singapore businesses a realistic sense of how PDPA fines actually land. Every case below links to the original PDPC decision. The full register is at pdpc.gov.sg/all-commissions-decisions.

Headline cases

YearOrganisationFinancial penaltyAffected individualsCause
2019SingHealth ServicesSGD 250,000~1.5 millionFailure to put in place reasonable security arrangements; 2018 cyberattack
2019Integrated Health Information Systems (IHiS)SGD 750,000~1.5 millionFailure to protect SingHealth patient data; same 2018 cyberattack
2024CarousellSGD 58,000~1.95 million accountsCompromised admin account; data exposed via API misconfiguration
2022MyRepublicSGD 60,000~79,388Unauthorised access to subscriber proof-of-identity documents
2021AIA SingaporeSGD 10,000Disclosure of personal data of policyholders to incorrect recipients
2018GrabcarSGD 6,000Email containing GrabHitch driver data sent to wrong recipients

A PDPC financial penalty is only covered if the policy says so, and insurers word this very differently. These are the verbatim clauses from the Singapore wordings on file:

CS

Which policies actually cover a PDPC penalty

Live results from our semantic search across the verbatim wordings of Singapore cyber policies — insurer, section and source shown for each clause. Not the marketing summary, the actual contract language.

Powered by clause search — semantic lookup over the verbatim SG cyber wordings. Verbatim text is reproduced for comparison and identification; each insurer's policy document is the authoritative source.

What changed in October 2022

The maximum financial penalty was raised to whichever is higher of:

  • 10% of the organisation's annual turnover in Singapore — for organisations whose SG turnover is above SGD 10 million; OR
  • SGD 1 million.

For most SMEs the SGD 1 million floor remains the practical ceiling. For large organisations the turnover-percentage cap is materially higher. PDPC has not (as of writing) issued a fine at the new 10%-turnover ceiling, but the policy direction is to align with GDPR-style enforcement.

What PDPC actually fines for (pattern)

Reading across the cases:

  • Failures of Obligation 6 (Protection) dominate — reasonable security arrangements not in place, misconfigured cloud, exposed databases, poor access control.
  • Phishing-led account takeovers leading to mass-data exposure are an increasingly common cause of large fines.
  • Non-cyber causes (email-to-wrong-recipient, lost USB drives) still produce fines — usually in the SGD 5,000–25,000 band.
  • The cyber-attack defence "our security was sophisticated but the attacker was more so" is generally not accepted; PDPC looks at reasonable arrangements relative to the data.

How cyber insurance helps: regulatory-defence cover pays for the legal costs of responding to a PDPC inquiry — which dwarfs the fine itself in most SME cases. The financial penalty (where insurable) may also be covered by a sublimit. Get quotes that disclose each insurer's regulatory-defence and fine sublimit.

Related reading